"L.C. (Laurentiu C. Badea)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Two issues I noticed while looking at the source for my problem: in > threads.c I believe it would be safer to end the fork_mutex critical > section after the forkers structure is updated (after line 1069), > not before (1051). > > Also it seems like if it ran out of slots it will return without > unblocking SIG_CHLD (threads.c:1058). Not sure if this is > intentional or not.
Fixed, thanks. These will be in 1.0.2 and all later versions. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
