Hi Nicolas, On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 19:06 +0100, Nicolas Baradakis wrote: > You could use the following patch to build radsqlrelay in the 1.0.x > source tree. However, you need to fix some minor compilation errors in > radsqlrelay.c because some variables are different between the release > and the CVS version.
I've been able to compile radsqlrelay from the cvs shortly after I sent the email. Thanks to the changes on the cvs. > I didn't keep a copy of radsqlrelay.c with the minimal changes. However > I can give you a link to the version I'm currently using: > > http://nbk.perso.cegetel.net/radsqlrelay.c > > This version can be built in the 1.0.x source tree. It has been modified > to fix the detail file locking issue under heavy load. Since you are > running tests on radsqlrelay, I'd be grateful if I could receive some > feedback from you on this version. There were a lot off differences between v1.3 against your v1.1.2.4 (code wise). I'm no C coder myself so I can't tell from the diff output what functionalities were changed. If there's a big advantage using the 1.1.2.4 I'd be happy to test it for you. Thanks and best regards, roy - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
