Re: Its so simple, but it doesn't work!

[Arun Mundray]

Thanks for you prompt reply, Alan. I'll follow your advice. The reason I 
havent used the "pair" functions is because although I spotted the API 
header, havent spotted any instructions on how they are used? The check for 
return values were removed from this example, as I wish to make it as short 
as possible. This test program is to be the basis of a client app, which is 
the reason im not using  radclient. If fact I compared the data structure of 
the example packet I generate, with that created by radclient using the same 
data - They look identical except the vector value is different. This lack 
of difference is what i can't explain.

Many thanks,
Arun Mundray.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alan DeKok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org>
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: Its so simple, but it doesn't work!


"Arun Mundray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was hoping someone could explain to me why this very basic radius 
client
test program does not work.
 What's wrong with using "radclient"?
 vp1 = (VALUE_PAIR *)malloc(sizeof(VALUE_PAIR));
 What's wrong with calling pairmake()?
 ppacket->vps = vp1;
 vp1->next = vp2;
 vp2->next = NULL;
 What's wrong with calling pairadd()?
 These functions exist for a reason.  Use them.
 rad_send(ppacket, NULL, secret);
 So... what does radsend when you set the debuging flags?
 close (ppacket->sockfd);
 rad_free(&ppacket);
 And you don't look for a response.  Hm...
 Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See 
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html