apparently we do agree. thanks to Josh for his comment. just one thing:
Alan DeKok wrote:
Josh Howlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the point the original poster was making was that Diameter
allows arbitrary conversations between NASes and servers that are
initiated by either party, via "applications", in an extensible manner.
Yup.
Which clients support diameter? I can't think of any.
Until Cisco starts shipping diameter clients in their boxes, all of
this discussion is wishful thinking.
see? as i said: now you _started_ talking about God :-)
ciao
artur
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
