Artur Hecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you know I remember a lot of users having _major_ problems with SCSI > because it was too forgiving for simple setups...
The server enforces sanity on what it needs. What it doesn't need it ignores. > why not at least mentioning that the server has just ignored a > configuration token for whatever reason? e.g. ignoring thread_pool > because -X was given at the command line. might help someone to see that > his new config is not accepted. and don't you "patches are welcome" on > me :-) Uh... OK. The real answer, though, is that the configuration files are interpreted *after* they're read. So doing what you suggest would mean having the second pass over the configuration files set flags on what was used, and adding a *third* pass that would print out configuration items that weren't flagged on the second one. I'm not sure it's worth it, honestly. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
