By the way, rlm_checkval meets in most cases losses ==8528== 200448 bytes in 783 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 178 of 190 ... ==8528== by 0x1BB83E41: regcomp (in /lib/tls/libc-2.3.2.so) ==8528== by 0x1D310FC3: do_checkval (rlm_checkval.c:275) ...
==8528== 60416 bytes in 59 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 162 of 190 ... ==8528== by 0x1BB88BF0: regexec (in /lib/tls/libc-2.3.2.so) ==8528== by 0x1D310FF4: do_checkval (rlm_checkval.c:281) ... ==8528== 55800 bytes in 15 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 159 of 190 ... ==8528== by 0x1BB83EBF: regcomp (in /lib/tls/libc-2.3.2.so) ==8528== by 0x1D310FC3: do_checkval (rlm_checkval.c:275) ... ==8528== 22320 bytes in 6 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 151 of 190 ... ==8528== by 0x1BB83EBF: regcomp (in /lib/tls/libc-2.3.2.so) ==8528== by 0x1D310FC3: do_checkval (rlm_checkval.c:275) ... etc. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
