Hello, > how did you patch?
What I did is that I took the rlm_ldap.c from FR 1.1.0 and replaced the content of the function ldap_pairget with the code shown on http://bugs.freeradius.org/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=112. Then I execute the './configure' and 'make' commands Natalia. On 3/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > I attached a copy of the file rlm_ldap.c of radius 1.1.0 > > yes, your patched version is clearly borked - as you can see from > this snippet. > > > int vals_count; > > int vals_idx; > > char *ptr; > > char *value; > > TLDAP_RADIUS *element; > > LRAD_TOKEN token; > > LRAD_TOKEN token, operator; > > int is_generic_attribute; > > char value[256]; > > char buf[MAX_STRING_LEN]; > > VALUE_PAIR *pairlist = NULL; > > VALUE_PAIR *newpair = NULL; > > char do_xlat = FALSE; > > LRAD_TOKEN has dual definitions. it should look similar to: > > char **vals; > int vals_count; > int vals_idx; > char *ptr; > char *value; > TLDAP_RADIUS *element; > LRAD_TOKEN token, operator; > int is_generic_attribute; > char buf[MAX_STRING_LEN]; > VALUE_PAIR *pairlist = NULL; > VALUE_PAIR *newpair = NULL; > char do_xlat = FALSE; > > how did you patch? I notice that the patch is no longer clean against the > 1.1.x CVS code...which means that more headaches will occur. someone with > the drive/desire needs to modify the patch for the more recent source > > alan > - > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
