Thanks for the pointers. All examples discuss unix groups and I need to avoid using those.
Can I create a file with several definitions like :
Finance = userA,userB,userC
Engineering = diffuserA,diffuserB,diffuserC
and somewhere else have another definition like:
Finance:
Reply-Message = "Hello Finance user %u"
Engineering:
Reply-Message = "Hello Engineering user %u"
and in users file, have
userA Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == "A123", Group == "Finance"
userB Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == "B123", Group == "Finance"
userC Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == "C123", Group == "Finance"
diffuserA Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == "A456", Group == "Engineering"
diffuserA Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == "B456", Group == "Engineering"
diffuserA Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == "C456", Group == "Engineering"
I'd appericiate some help with achieving this.
Thanks,
Ami
On 8/23/06, Alan DeKok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Ami Schieber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've seen several Q&A about local groups of users but they all refer to
> system groups (i.e. - /etc/group configuration).
> I'd like to have a Group definition that will include attributes that are
> common to all users that belong in this group.
See the FAQ, and "man rlm_passwd", which describes exactly this.
Alan DeKok.
--
http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book
http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
