Peter Nixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good question. Does anyone have anything against changing this?
They primary key should be a synthetic field, and not something
derived directly from the packet. Calling it 'acctuniqueid' is
awkward, maybe renaming it to 'radiuskey'?
It can then be used in the SQL queries as
%{Acct-Unique-ID:-%{Acct-Session-id}}, which should be safe for all
configuration.
Alan DeKok.
--
http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book
http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
