Peter Nixon wrote:
The code in rlm_sql.c definitely does not do that, at least in 1.1.3 as
far as I can understand the code? Instead it appears to smoosh the user
and all the group check items together, compares them, and if they *all*
match adds *all* the reply items.

This seems to make groups pretty useless except for using the SQL-Group
construct in the users file.

Comments?

I believe you are correct. It's been a while since I looked at the SQL Groups functionality, but last time I did I quickly decided to do the processing I required from my own table structure with an SQL function. That way you get _exactly_ what you want at the cost of having to think about a schema that fits your need. Works pretty well for us :-)

Someone really needs to take a knife the the SQL Groups code.. But, there you have it. Feel free to help out any time you want :-)

Actually, having just done a "cvs up"the CVS code appears to do things "the right way", and is generally a lot cleaner; none of the query_table config options for example, and a much cleaner iteration logic for groups.

From what I can tell a straight swap of the src/modules/rlm_sql directory would have a reasonable chance of working - I might try that.

The specific driver for this was wanting a NIS netgroup-style group membership table, i.e.:

create table groups (
  id serial,
  precedence integer not null default 0,
  username text,
  callingstationid text,
  groupname text not null,
  primary key (id)
);

insert into groups (precedence,username,callingstationid,groupname)

-- ban joe on all hosts
...values (10, 'joe', null, 'BANNED');

-- ban this MAC for all users
...values (10, null, '00:11:22:33:44:55', 'BANNED');

-- permit this guest from their laptop only
...values (5, 'guest', 'aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff', 'OK');
...values (4, 'guest', null, 'BANNED');



...then set the "group membership" query to:

select distinct groupname from (
 select * from groups where
  username='%{SQL-User-Name}'
 or
  callingstationid='%{Calling-Station-Id}'
 order by precedence,groupname
) as groups

...which would allow you to e.g. put MAC addresses into BANNED groups, users into BANNED groups, but maybe permit a user to login from certain specific machines, by manipulating the precedence correctly.

If someone isn't already working on it I'll have a crack at backporting the CVS SQL code. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to