Alan DeKok wrote: > Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote: > >> It was PAP... >> >> Running with debugging mode *off* yields much better results ! >> > > Well, yes. > > I liked the pretty text ?! >> Still with completely vanilla install , >> only getting >> >> [req] => 5000 >> [parallel] => 10 >> [total] => 50000 >> [start] => 1178820825.99 >> [stop] => 1178820836.79 >> [period] => 10.791821003 >> [req_s] => 4633 >> > > That's pretty low. I'm a little surprised, in fact. I was getting > that performance almost 6 years ago on machines available then. > > Yes it's worryingly low,
This is with the G5 optimisation compiler flags passed to GCC... Though i'm not sure it's taking them ... should just be env CFLAGS=-O3 -mcpu=970 -mtune=970 -mpowerpc64 ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/freeradius-cvsfast make make install ... But the configure script doesn't seem to take notice of the CFLAGS env variable , so does not pass the flags to the compiler at build time. Have you had anyone else running FreeRADIUS on a G5 feed back about performance ? >> localhost to localhost >> > > Try from one machine to another. Maybe the client & server are > competing for resources on the same machine. > Will try machine to machine on monday, or later today if I have time, though I suspect the performance will probably be worse. top reveals that radclient is running at about 70% utilization and radiusd at 104%. These boxes are not under any kind of load and have a pretty vanilla install of Mac OSX Server 10.4.9. Can't figure out why it's so slow. > Alan DeKok. > -- > http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book > http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog > - > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
