Alan wrote: > NFS mounted? Don't. If NFS goes away, any application using those > directories will lock, and be unkillable.
it's part of a red hat cluster, and it's managed by that software suite. If a machine dies a transparent switch occurs. If it fails I'll get angry with red hat --so far it didn't happen (and I didn't bother finding out if it's nfs-based or something else). This feature is not critical, ok. I can live without it. It just works, and simplifies analisys a lot. I've got other reasons to be angry with red had, but this is not the case. Personally I like sshfs much more than nfs, but it's prone to similar problems as those above. So I won't use it. bye, inverse - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
