No. Fastusers uses flat (users type) file. There is no "fastsql" module.
Again, if you think that database stored on disk is too slow for you feel free to use heap (memory) tables. Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP Dana 30/7/2007, "Roy Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> piše: >Maybe I am misunderstanding you, but are you saying there is already a method >to pull the data from the database and cache it using 'fastusers'? I do not >see anyway to do that... > >There are a lot reasons to keep the data in a database, look at the NAS table >(I realize it is read-on-start for DOS reasons) but someone must be of the >same mind set as me or there would be no client support in the SQL module. > >Roy > >________________________________ > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Sun 7/29/2007 3:42 PM >To: FreeRadius users mailing list >Subject: Re: SQL usage ideas > > > >Hi, >> Well if you understand server/client systems, no client request is >> INIFINATELY faster than a server cached request. So when you get to the >> point where you need to handle several hundred requests a second, you do the >> math. > >depends on how the SQL tables are indexed, how the server is configured >etc etc - certainly I've got some very complex queries that upon benchmarking >against a million entries can run in less than 0.00 (ie MySQL basic >counter in seconds isnt good enough to measure ;-) ) > >but if you want to take your data, then cache it in memory rather than >query it.....well, that sounds much like having it in memory and not >in a database at all - ie 'fastusers' and the such...rather than a >database as we know it. > >alan >- >List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > > > > - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
