Hi Stefan, It may be primarily Cisco that pushes TACACS+ because ACS is a much better TACACS+ server than it is a RADIUS server. However, there are many vendors that offer some degree of support for TACACS+ just to avoid one of the barriers to entering the many Cisco only networks. :-)
Rgds, Guy On 07/01/2008, Stefan Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Could you add this to the wiki ? > > > > http://wiki.freeradius.org/Cisco > > Done. > > > I myself don't use any Cisco kit, but the situation is much the same > > with HP Procurve Switches. > > On all but the most expensive switches TACACS+ is the only way to define > > command lists, on all the others your > > either a manager or an operator. > > HP Claim to support a few VSA's for setting command lists and priv > > levels, but on most of their switches they don't actually work ! > > Amazing. I would have thought TACACS+ is totally dead and only Cisco holds up > their flag. > > Stefan > > -- > Stefan WINTER > > Stiftung RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et de > la Recherche > Ingenieur Forschung & Entwicklung > > 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi > L-1359 Luxembourg > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel.: +352 424409-1 > http://www.restena.lu Fax: +352 422473 > > - > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > > - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
