(sorry i still don't know how to reply into a thread from yahoo web mail)
Yeah I agree. All the supplicants I used are ok with that. I just thought I
might point it out ... Thanks for your reply Alan.
Re: include_length and EAP-TTLS
________________________________
* To: FreeRadius users mailing list
<[email protected]>
* Subject: Re: include_length and EAP-TTLS
* From: Alan DeKok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:58:14 +0100
* In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Reply-to: FreeRadius users mailing list
<[email protected]>
* User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105)
________________________________
Gong Cheng wrote:
> I wonder if this is a small violation of the EAP-TTLS RFC (5281).
>
> In RFC 5281 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5281#section-9.2.2, it states:
>
> " .... Fragments other than the first MUST NOT have the L
> bit set. ...
> "
>
> while this behavior is configurable in eap.conf:
...
> I confess that I only actually SEE the behavior in the now ancient 1.1.6
> version, and only took a quick look at the 2.1.0 config file and source code.
> I apologize if I missed something or this had been brought up before.
I don't think it's serious. I don't know why this is a MUST NOT,
because it makes very little difference to the protocol. And
supplicants that break if the L bit is set on second fragments are badly
written.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html