On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 21:08 -0500, Josh Hiner wrote: > On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 23:05 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > > >Yes the cert is there, does report the correct oid etc.. etc.. Attached > > >is the client certificate I am using. I even went into the configuration > > >and made it so XP asks me to select my certificate manually. I select > > >the certificate manually and it still gives the same error as above > > >(Error in RegOpenKeyEx for base key, 2) etc.. Maybe there is still a > > >problem with the certificate but it all looks fine to me. Can you peak > > >at the cert for me? This is happening on all machines so there must be a > > >problem with it? When I install the cert it asks me for the cert > > >password which I type in (I use the password I put in the client.cnf > > >file). There should be an input and output password in client.cnf > > >correct? I'm at a loss. > > > > > > > It is most likely a deliberate undermining of self-signed certificates. > > It looks wery much like this bug reported for machine certificates (user > > certificates weren't affected at the time). > > > > http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/itproxpsp/thread/ceaf827d-3cff-4a5f-a8e0-d32ac2bf9ea9/ > > > > Ivan Kalik > > Kalik Informatika ISP > Ug! For such a problem, I am not seeing anything come across the mailing > list. I would think that what I am doing is fairly popular? Why are more > people not complaining? This is too bad and if true, very poor. ---- I was complaining about it a few weeks ago (all my systems have been upgraded to SP3) and I was made to feel that it was just me.
Craig - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
