Seamus Bridgeman wrote: > We have a need to use dbm file given our volumes and migration from > current dbm based Radius.
In 2.x, the "users" file is put into an internal hash. So it's just as fast (if not faster) than DBM files. I've tested it reading 10's of 1000's of entries in the "users" file in less than a second. So unless you have 100's of 1000's of entries in the "users" file, the DBM overhead is unnecessary. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
