Matthieu Lazaro wrote: > Here is the content of a packet received by radiusd:
Weird, but OK. > Futhermore, to reply to Alan about the radiusUserCategory, it is given > with the radius.schema for ldap. Is it a useless attribute then? Yes. > I'll be checking this afternoon and testing about putting more info in > ldap.attrmap to see if the filters work. See also doc/rlm_ldap. This *is* documented. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
