On 5/6/09 19:10, [email protected] wrote:
Hi,
No they can't. Reply-Messages are prohibited in packets containing EAP-Message
attributes.
really? well...I guess if you believe in RFC 3579 and hope that everyone
read section 2.2 of that - invalid packet discussion then you'd
hope so... however, I see tonnes of packets proxied through the NRPS
that have EAP-Message and Reply-Message in the same packet.
None of them are coming from Sussex though :)
Which is why I specified an alternate VSA :P
aye. Microsoft actually have a 'Reason-Code' that is interesting...
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc785145.aspx
That is indeed interesting. Sent you an email off-list.
Arran
--
Arran Cudbard-Bell ([email protected]),
Authentication, Authorisation and Accounting Officer,
Infrastructure Services (IT Services),
E1-1-08, Engineering 1, University Of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QT
DDI+FAX: +44 1273 873900 | INT: 3900
GPG: 86FF A285 1AA1 EE40 D228 7C2E 71A9 25BB 1E68 54A2
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
