On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 17:49 +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
> Stateful IPv6 (aka DHCPv6) is not there yet. There are numerous, serious 
> problems with the IPv6 RFCs, in particular the exact semantics of the 
> M/O bits.

I have to disagree. It's "there" sufficiently to be used in the
enterprise. Yes, you will have some surprises, but if you KISS for now,
you'll have a generally acceptable experience. If you want to mix and
match static, stateful and stateless in a single subnet, you'll want to
test it first :-)

Regards, K.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer ([email protected])                   +61-2-64957160 (h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/~kauer/                  +61-428-957160 (mob)

GPG fingerprint: 07F3 1DF9 9D45 8BCD 7DD5 00CE 4A44 6A03 F43A 7DEF

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to