Charles Gregory wrote: > It clearly conveys my intention and my first attempt at code.
Yes... and it clearly conveys that you hadn't read the documentation that came with the version you had. > So with (dwindling) respect, if you can't get the IDEA from that > then you really are a serious waste of time. Exactly. I've written much of the server, much of the documentation, I answer a lot of questions on the list, and you're *so* frustrated with me that you think I'm a waste of time. Or... maybe something else is going on. > Tell you what. You write me off as another stubborn stupid individual > who cannot see the 'common sense' in using the latest version of > software, and I will write you off as someone who cannot appreciate that > people who installed a piece of software when it was NEW would like to > keep using that software as long as it fulfills the needs of the system > in a stable secure fashion. I apologize for my ignorance, but not for > sticking with something that works. If you had bothered reading my messages, you would see that I *explicitly* stated that some people want to run older, supported, versions of software, and that this was fine. I think that says it all. We're in violent agreement for most things, and yet you're frustrated that I'm explaining the *reasons* behind my opinions. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
