David Jones wrote:
> Thanks to some handy hints in here, I've had some success with rlm_perl. But
> (and there is always a but)
>
> I've been happily developing against 2.x but have just discovered I need to
> actually use 1.x because of RHEL.
You can install version 2.x on RHEL.
> The rlm_perl link of both version 1 and version 2 points to the same
> documentation page, so I made the assumption that although theres much
> different under the covers of FR, by the time you get to perl its all hidden,
> and I could just take a perl script that works on V2 and run it on V1.
>
> But it doesn't. There seems to be different handling of the module return
> values, and of $RAD_CHECK{'Response-Packet-Type'} = "Access-Challenge". FR
> V1 seems quite unkeen to send out responses.
>
> So, and finally the question; Are there supposed to be differences in
> behaviour for rlm_perl between V1 and V2?
Lots.
There are a huge number of changes between v1 and v2. We suggest
using v2 for almost everything.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
