Hemlata Shekatkar wrote: > 2) I ran the tests with -n 500 and the results were really awful. Only > 15 for the 500 requests sent.
That seems to indicate that the jradius portion has *extremely* long latencies. > I have run tests with both -n and -p > options with various request numbers and the results with -n have been > really bad consistently. I also increased the memory for jradius to > xmx512m but still did not get any higher performance or load numbers. Email me off-list, and we'll see if we can figure this out. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
