Josip Rodin wrote: > Yes, I understood that originally. The gist of the rationale for the current > behaviour is quite clear, but even so, many users would nevertheless be best > served by many per-packet errors being more clearly visible, because even > when they enable debug level 2+, they get a huge amount of output that is > hard for them to handle. Errors don't particularly stand out in the crowd, > and that isn't practical.
Good point. > Perhaps the best compromise for some of these issues would be what the > Linux kernel folks did with WARN_ONCE() or printk_once(). I'll look into that. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
