Bjørn Mork wrote: > Just stumbled across a semi-related issue (all accounting modules > returned "noop" for a request) which made me wonder if not the recently > added documentation for handling noop accounting requests should be > promoted to "enabled by default"?
You mean tell the NAS we logged something that wasn't really logged? > It does not make much sense to ignore > valid accounting requests just because no module knows how to handle > them. They might be valid... but the whole point of accounting is to *do* something with the packets. I understand your point... but I'm a little wary of ACKing packets when we didn't do anything with them. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
