Tabacchiera Stefano wrote: > I've done my tests with an ad-hoc pool, with maximum_timeout set at 10 secs. > And the results I posted came from a new test session done the day after the > first test. > (24 hrs >> 10 secs) > > Why that timeout doesn't apply?
Did you set Session-Timeout? If not, you're telling the server that the IPs are valid forever. > >>> So I need a method to avoid my pool being filled up by missing acct-stop. >> You were told a method which should work. Try it. > > Surely I'll switch to sql pool, but what I observe is that dbm pool are > useless, if I can't set a timeout *that works* on that. <shrug> SQL is usually a lot better than building the saeme functionality on top of a DB file. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
