Bjørn Mork wrote: > I fail to see how that is wrong. It *is* the NASes Calling Station > identificator. What do you suggest a PPPoE concentrator should use?
Something better. VSAs, even. Using random fields in random "printable" formats is a bad idea. RADIUS has the concept of "attributes". These attributes have names, specific meanings, and well-defined formats. I have no idea why many vendors are unable to use them. > Yes, I know RFC 2865 says "phone number". But if fails to say anything > about the situation where there is no originating phone number. So > vendors use what they have. And port/vlan/mac is the best they can do > unless they have some PPPoE intermediate agent information. So define VSAs. Other vendors have. It's not hard. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
