Bjørn Mork wrote: > Which implies that commit 5a710e98 is completely bogus.
Well, no. It's still a good idea. The implementation is just too specific. > We cannot check > for existing servers that way. It would be possible to eliminate those > with matching file names and line numbers, but that would still fail for > no good reason if you modified the virtual server configuration and > HUPed the server. The solution is to use cf_top_section(). If the two virtual servers share the same top-level CONF_SECTION, then they're duplicates. Otherwise, they're from different HUPs. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
