Hi, > 2.2.0 is explicitly compatible with 2.1.12. The only change is to fix > something which was *broken* in 2.1.12.
Is there really much point in calling it 2.2.0 then? If people don't like a "13" patch-level number, it could also be called 2.1.14 :-) Cranking up the minor version number just leads to many people asking the kind of "can I upgrade" questions we've just gone through. Greetings, Stefan Winter -- Stefan WINTER Ingenieur de Recherche Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et de la Recherche 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg Tel: +352 424409 1 Fax: +352 422473
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
