this is the kind of @## () response one can see online from these ignorant
retards (+ online bravery!) who wrote some sucking code for this almost dead so
called protocol. doesn't get it.
________________________________
From: Alan DeKok <[email protected]>
To: FreeRadius users mailing list <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 2:37 AM
Subject: Re: configure challenge..
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
> On 4 Sep 2012, at 05:21, Rod Luzic <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> put some links dummy- people have their own features to worry about unlike
>> spend whole life doing this almost obsolete Radius stuff like you. how would
>> one configure A-C. damn simple question.
>
> and what features would those be?
>
> I'm all for being a complete and utter asshole when the context justifies it,
> but insulting people like that buys you nothing*.
>
> update control {
> Packet-Response-Type := Access-Challenge
> }
>
> The server will complain depending on version, but it still works.
It doesn't tie the NEXT Access-Request to the current one. That's
what the State attribute is for.
And no, I won't give an example. There's already example code in the
server to do that. Only idiots and the terminally lazy can't find it.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
