On 10/17/2012 08:26 AM, Arpit Jain wrote:

Does it mean that freeradius client is just a dummy client and there is
no point in performing compliance testing on it?

radclient and radeapclient are not NASes. They don't provide service to users, and they don't run as daemons. They're for server administrators to test FreeRADIUS.

You could in theory build a NAS on top of "radclient", using it to send the packets, but that's not the usual approach.

To again send any authentication or authorization request, radclient
binary needs to be executed again.

As per my understanding, the binary should not have exited.

As above your understanding is wrong, it's a program for testing the RADIUS server. Once you've sent the test packet(s), it exits.

*Please let me know if I need some extra configuration to achieve the
above functionality.*

You need to go away and do some basic reading around the subject. Try the current version of the RADIUS RFCs for starters, instead of obsoleted ones.

It sounds like you want a NAS, which is the component that provides network service to the user, and authenticates it using an embedded radius client.

NASes are specific to the network layer - modem, ADSL, ethernet/802.1x, wifi/802.11, webauth, VPN, etc.

See: pppd, chillispot, hostapd, and so on.

Does freeradius package provide a separate binary/module for USER
application?

If not, can we consider RADIUS CLIENT as our USER as well?

No. A user is a user. As in, a human being. As in, the person doing the using?

This isn't really the place to be asking "RADIUS 101" questions. There are books on the topic, though I don't have any specific recommendations.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to