On 17 Feb 2013, at 18:38, Walter Goulet <wgou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your input; your descriptions of limitations you ran into is > helpful. I think I will stick with using rlm_perl for now; I definitely don't > want to tackle writing my own stripped down RADIUS server. If performance or > scale become problems I will investigate other options at that time.
The only way rlm_rest gets out development is if people test it and contribute to it. I'm willing to put the effort in to extend it and fix any issues if people are willing to test it and make suggestions. -Arran - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
