On 10 Jul 2013, at 23:59, Arran Cudbard-Bell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 10 Jul 2013, at 16:29, Phil Mayers <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 10/07/13 15:43, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote: >> >>> Update sections may now also return fail. >> >> Can you clarify - AIUI, sql xlat can now also distinguish between empty and >> fail, so if I do this: >> >> update { >> request:Tmp-String-0 := "%{sql:...}" >> } >> >> ...and the SQL server is down, the xlat will fail and the update section as >> a whole will fail? If so - very very cool. >> - > > Yes. Errors bubble from sql_xlat up to the update section. If the value > returned from the SQL statement is empty, a zero length attribute will be > created, as with 2.x.x, provided that the statement completed successfully. Ah, yes, and the reason for the failure will be available in Module-Failure-Msg, which is now pretty much always populated correctly as it's updated by the RERROR REDEBUG REDEBUG2 macros. Arran Cudbard-Bell <[email protected]> FreeRADIUS Development Team - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
