Hello, On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 20:19, Marc-André Moreau <marcandre.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Jay Sorg <jay.s...@gmail.com> wrote: >> If this must be done, there is another alternative. >> Rewrite the library from docs using the new license. >> I would join this effort plus I would like to re architect libfreerdp >> anyway. > > That might be a viable option if the affected code is not that big. Changing > a license is hard, doing it twice (LGPL, then ASL) would be a lot of work. > We need to weight the advantages and disadvantages. However, if we need to > go this way, I'm open to the idea if the disadvantages aren't that bad.
I'd very sad to see all the work done on FreeRDP die and to be redone. The work need for it could be much more fruitful if we focus on complete the missing gabs on the code and get a fully supported client multi-platform/os. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Freerdp-devel mailing list Freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freerdp-devel
