On 3/2/2011 8:13 AM, Marc-André Moreau wrote: > > By regular hardware, do you mean hardware that does not include the > special RemoteFX chip? Adding RemoteFX support without the chip means > implementing the codec in software, and that is way too much for a > student to do in a summer. I have looked at the codec specification, > it definitely is non-trivial. Of course I'd like to get that done, but > I don't think it fits the form of tasks we can propose for google > summer of code. >
Opps... I added RemoteFX to the list before my email client displayed the rest of this discussion. My question... does it hurt to leave it there even if it isn't likely to find someone with that expertise? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Freerdp-devel mailing list Freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freerdp-devel
