I am wondering the following:
can github provide this nice feature I see in gitorious (team clones), where
a company like O.S.Systems can have their own repository clone for their
day-to-day development activities? Maybe I don't know github enough, but it
appears to me that it makes it trivial for individuals to "fork" a project
to fix some things, and contribute it back, but I am not sure if it has
something to match the gitorious "team clones". Gitorious also has "personal
clones" which are pretty much the same as team clones, except that they are
for individuals and not entire teams.
github and gitorious are both pretty good, but gitorious' team clones are
pretty nice. Also, I find the gitorious interface more pleasant to use, but
that's a personal preference. Feel free to point me to features of github
that I do not know well, I still think both are two good options. The choice
would be easier if one of them was really bad, but both are actually good,
making the decision harder :P
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Vic Lee <ll...@163.com> wrote:
> Has anyone has experience with github? I haven't much experience with
> gitorious, but some time ago when I was playing with xbmc (which is a
> HUGE project) and they moved from sourceforge.net to github. I
> contributed a patch for them, and I had the chance to experience github
> features. Some good things I saw are for example:
>
> 1. Pull request: I can login and fork the entire project on the web.
> After I've done something, I can request a merge upstream by creating a
> pull request from my branch to the original one I forked.
>
> 2. Upstream developers can easily make comments on the patch or on the
> pull request itself. Better to look at the one I've made. :)
>
> https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/pull/33
> (pay close attention to the 2nd and 3rd comments)
>
> That's just another alternative, maybe someone has experience on both
> can compare.
>
> Vic
>
> On 03/10/2011 12:36 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 15:54, Marc-André Moreau
> > <marcandre.mor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ...
> >> I have been thinking about it for a while, what would you guys think of
> >> switching from the sourceforge.net git repository to gitorious.org? It
> would
> >> make things easier for maintaining two git repositories under the same
> >> project. I'm not even sure if sourceforge.net allows that.
> >
> > I'd love that. We have been using it for a while and it works quite
> > well specially for this kind of project.
> >
> > Some time ago, we created the project there[1] so it is just a matter
> > of update it and make it "official".
> >
> > 1. http://gitorious.org/freerdp
> >
> > So I do support this move.
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
> A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
> for your organization - today and in the future.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Freerdp-devel mailing list
> Freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freerdp-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Freerdp-devel mailing list
Freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freerdp-devel
