On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Nils Andresen <n...@nils-andresen.de>wrote:
> Marc-André,
> is there a reason you reverted find_optional_package back to find_package
> in
>
> https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP-1.0/commit/9b40f800de8aa096aa042c5fb1898691b34f82ee#client/X11/CMakeLists.txt
> ?
>
Those packages are not that "optional" after all, they really break core
features of xfreerdp if not used. Is it me or if the package is named
optional, it is not included by default, even though the development package
may be present on the system? should the user explicitly add a package
marked as optional? if the package is not marked as optional, it can still
build without it, but it'll try to include it by default, which is the
behavior that is preferred in this case.
What do you think?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K
The only unified storage solution that offers unified management
Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient.
Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Freerdp-devel mailing list
Freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freerdp-devel
