--On 5 September 2012 15:02:26 -0700 Huihong Luo <huisi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> A pure java client with same features as FreeRDP will be a huge > undertaking, any particular reason why a java client is needed? FreeRDP > uses ARM NEON or Intel MMX optimizations for performance, all of these > will be lost with pure java client, besides the efforts. Since each major > platforms will have a native client, I don't see obvious reason for a > java client. We have a requirement to work without installing client s/w, cross-platform and integrated into our existing web app. The obvious way to do this is in-browser (e.g. with Guacamole/guacd+libfreerdb or freerdp-webconnect) but this fails with people running 'old' browsers (for this read IE early than IE10 - sadly there is a lot of this still running in enterprises). For these folks we need give the Java support. Given properjavardp already connects to Windows Server 2008, my suspicion was that the incremental work to support Windows Server 2012 would be small. Am I wrong about that? Obviously there is far more in freerdp. -- Alex Bligh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Freerdp-devel mailing list Freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freerdp-devel
