On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Alexander R Angas wrote: > After thinking about this for a while, I'm not sure if it's such a good idea to > go with the separating the song playing from the actual song and event control > approach. Rather than leap into spending a lot of time and effort in trying it > out, it might be a good idea to do a pros and cons list comparing the two > models for this. Is it necessary to go for the "big bang" approach? It seems an incremental approach might make more sense: implementing an model more compatible with the event driven capabilities, and then trying to decouple playing, if it still seems like a good idea or is even necessary. -- http://www.clock.org/~matt
- [freesci-develop] Re: Event-driven sound server Stuffed Crust
- [freesci-develop] Re: Event-driven sound server Alexander R Angas
- [freesci-develop] Re: Event-driven sound server Matt
- [freesci-develop] Re: Event-driven sound server Matt
- [freesci-develop] Re: Event-driven sound server Christoph Reichenbach
- [freesci-develop] Re: Event-driven sound server Christoph Reichenbach
- [freesci-develop] Re: Event-driven sound server Christoph Reichenbach
- [freesci-develop] Re: Event-driven sound server Christoph Reichenbach
- [freesci-develop] Re: Event-driven sound server Stuffed Crust
- [freesci-develop] Re: Event-driven sound server Stuffed Crust
- [freesci-develop] Re: Event-driven sound server Stuffed Crust
- [freesci-develop] Re: Event-driven sound server Christoph Reichenbach
- [freesci-develop] Re: Event-driven sound server Christoph Reichenbach
