Hi Matt,
> The good news:
> FSCI matches SSCI version 0.000.572 and above. You guys probably already
> knew this, but having a script run in both interpreters to accurately
> report it is kind of nice!
No argument there ;-)
> The bad news:
> SSCI 0.000.490 has slight variations -- the priority band for 10, 12, and
> 14 start at 137, 158, and 179.
Can you confirm that 8 still starts on 117? By simply setting the last
priority line to 178 I get a list that looks like the one you described,
just with 8 starting on 116.
> (As opposed to 138, 159, and 180 in 0.572
> and above.) When I tried to use FSCI's -V parameter to emulate version
> 0.490, I got crashes. I tried -V490 and -V0.000.490. The first just output
> the same numbers as before. The second one caused a crash!
Could you send me a compiled version of the script, please? scc doesn't
seem to eat your script ("Segment name expected"). And, if possible, a
stack trace...
Thanks!
llap,
Christoph
