Hi,
I posted the message below about a week ago but didn't get a reply.
Any help is much appreciated!
Thanks and best,
Isabel
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Dziobek, Isabel 
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 11:38 AM
To: Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Cortical thickness group analyses


Dear All,
 
I have some questions in regard to the FreeSurfer group analyses (I am using
the 3.0 Version), for which I would appreciate your help.
 
I am trying to compare a patient to a control group with respect to cortical
thickness (regressing out variables such as age and IQ) and also to see if
associations exist in specific ROIs between cortical thickness and cognitive
variables (for the groups separately).
 
I started constructing a group descriptor file containing the two classes
(patient and control) and the variable age. First, I wanted to compare the
groups disregarding any other variable and so I constructed the following
contrast vector: (1 -1 0), assuming doss and thinking that the ³0² meant
that this column of the design matrix would not be taken into account in the
model. However, this yielded the same result as running (1 -1 1).
Do I have to construct a separate fsgd file only containing the classes and
then a contrast vector (1 -1)?
 
What about regressing out more than 1 variable (e.g. age and IQ), how does
the contrast vector have to look like then?
 
Also, how do I look at correlations between those variables and cortical
thickness for the groups separately? When loading the scatter plots of the
fsgd, the regression line for the separate groups seems to run always
parallel, which does not seem very likely (see attached jpg). Are these
regression lines at all? Where can I obtain the Rs in numbers?
 
Can I, alternatively, stream out the numbers for the cortical thickness of a
defined ROI to then run correlations in SPSS. Where would I find those
numbers?
 
I was also wondering about corrections for intracranial vault. Does the
registration to the group¹s average brain takes care of differences in
overall head size or is it advisable to put icv as a separate regressor (as
is done in very few studies)?
 
Thanks a lot for your help and happy holidays,
 
Isabel  



**************************************
Isabel Dziobek, PhD
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Independent Junior Research Group
Neurocognition of Decision-Making
Max-Planck Institute for Human Development
Lentzeallee 94 
14195 Berlin 

Phone: +49 30 82406 619
Fax: +49 30 82406 616
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to