That is, I can use fslmaths from fsl suite to subtract my binarized subfield rois. - Josh
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Joshua Lee <jki...@ucdavis.edu> wrote: > Ha nevermind. While true, I can just mask the masks with each other and > drop the over lapped regions. > - > Josh > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Joshua Lee <jki...@ucdavis.edu> wrote: > >> Dear experts, >> >> The hippocampal-subfield are expressed as probability maps. For each >> subfield, each voxel is assigned a probability of inclusion on a scale of >> [0-255]=[0-1]. However, If I were to select only voxels from each >> subfield's probability map corresponding to a >50% chance (i.e. >> mri_binarize -min 150), then I would expect that no subfield would overlap >> with another (i.e. a voxel shouldn't have greater than 50% probability of >> belonging CA1, AND a greater than 50% probability of belonging to CA4-DG. >> However it appears that this is not the case, and overlap does occur. Thus, >> unless I messed up, subfields are not mutually exclusive. Have I got this >> right? And if so, how do I obtain binary maps of subfields with no overlap? >> >> Thanks >> >> Josh >> > >
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
