thanks bruce. indeed, we are not expecting identical output and in these cases that we are looking at it's all 5.x for most part.
cheers, satra On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>wrote: > Hi Satra, > > certainly fsaverage will change if we change things in spherical > registration, or potentially elsewhere. I don't anticipate any large > changes, but I wouldn't count on them being identical > Bruce > > On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Satrajit Ghosh wrote: > > hi bruce and others, >> are there any specific implications we should be worried about (e.g., >> with qdec or surf2surf) when using an fsaverage >> that's from a different version that ran the recon. >> >> cheers, >> >> satra >> >> >> >> > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it > is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the > e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance > HelpLine at > http://www.partners.org/**complianceline<http://www.partners.org/complianceline>. > If the e-mail was sent to you in error > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and > properly > dispose of the e-mail. > >
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
