Hi Anastasia,
yes, for some subject the low-b volume is in the end.Some subjects have again 
incomplete tracts.I'm attacking an example of configuration file that I'm 
using.I hope that you can check it please.
Thanks,

Stefano



----Messaggio originale----
Da: ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Data: 5-apr-2013 18.45
A: <std...@virgilio.it>
Cc: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu"<freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Ogg: Re: R: Re: [Freesurfer] incomplete tracts


Hi Stefano - In your case we determined that the ones that had the low-b 
volume in the end didn't run correctly, right? In that case, I didn't need 
to see anything, you were going to try running 5.2.

a.y

On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, std...@virgilio.it wrote:

> Hi Anastasia,
> could I send you the data of a subject that I don't run correctly? 
> 
> I still have some subjects with tracts incomplete and I do not know if it 
> depends from
> my analysis or whether the images are not good.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Stefano
> 
> 
> ----Messaggio originale----
> Da: ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Data: 5-apr-2013 17.37
> A: "Gerit Pfuhl"<gerit.pf...@gmail.com>
> Cc: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu"<freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Ogg: Re: [Freesurfer] incomplete tracts
> 
> 
> Hi Gerit - If it's not an issue with the gradient table but instead a
> tractography initialization issue, I strongly recommend running 5.2 with
> bbregister for the registration (which is the default in 5.2 anyway).
> 
> You can also upload an example data set with issues (include: dmri,
> dmri.bedpostX, dlabel, dpath, scripts) here for me to take a look:
> https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2/
> 
> Hope this helps,
> a.y
> 
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Gerit Pfuhl wrote:
> 
> > Dear Anastasia,
> >
> > thanks for the help. There is also a line option in freeview. However we 
> > still have
> > brains with missing tracks, I rerun them with increasing the ncpts and 
> > registering
> to
> > bbr (since that is default in Tracula 5.2.). We are reasonable confident 
> > that our
> bvel
> > and bvac are correct, since we have roughly 20 cases out of 90 processed 
> > brains
> where
> > there are no missing tracts. Further sometimes only one tract is missing, 
> > sometimes
> it
> > is more severe. We could not find any correlation with recon-all problems 
> > or DTI raw
> > data issues (all but one were without moving artefacts). Since we are 
> > running
> bedpostx
> > outside of trac-all (i.e. trac-prep then bedpostx then trac-path) might it 
> > be an
> issue
> > that is solved with installing the 5.2. version? Would that run in 
> > freesurfer 5.1.0?
> > I guess we need to change the dcmrirc files only a bit.
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Gerit Pfuhl
> >
> >
> > On 3 April 2013 16:59, Anastasia Yendiki <ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> 
> > wrote:
> >
> >       Hi Benjamin - I'd look in a coronal view to see if the lines in the 
> > corpus
> >       callosum follow the curvature of the corpus callosum, and in a 
> > sagittal
> >       view to see if the lines in the cingulum follow the curvature of the
> >       cingulum. Does this make sense?
> >
> >       a.y
> >
> >       On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Roschinski, Benjamin wrote:
> >
> >       Dear Anastasia,
> >
> >       we dislpayed dtifit_V1 as lines, overlaid on dtifit_FA because our
> >       gradient table is wrong but I am not really sure how to analyse
> >       these informations. You wrote to Stefano the lines have to point in
> >       the right direction and that the eigenvectors are not pointing along
> >       his corpus callosum. Can you give me a more detailed description
> >       what I have to do when I dislpay dtifit_V1 as lines, overlaid on
> >       dtifit_FA.
> >
> >       Thanks and kind regards
> >       Benjamin
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the 
> > e-mail
> > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance 
> > HelpLine at
> > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
> > error
> > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
> > properly
> > dispose of the e-mail.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://gerit-orientation.blogspot.com
> > http://team-arzgebirg.blogspot.com
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> 
> 
> 
>


 

Attachment: dmrirc_single_subject4d
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to