glad to hear it On Sat, 6 Apr 2013, Dan LaFreniere wrote:
> Hi Bruce, > > Apologies for the delay - was having some issues with the automatic > moderator approval. > > That's good to hear, thank you for your help. You're spot on, the right > temporal lobes appear to be in worse shape than the left. Control points > certainly help a great deal with these images. The surfs seem pretty good - > I've attached a screen of the surfs for you from the same subject and same > slice (these are following an -autorecon2-cp run). No major problems from > what I can see. > > Cheers, > > Dan > > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > wrote: > Hi Dan > > if the surfs look good you are all set. Does it go from left to > right or right to left? Rightmost temporal lobes look the > darkest to me. I would have thought you would still need some > control points, but if not that's great > Bruce > > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Dan LaFreniere wrote: > > Dear Experts, > > I've been working on cleaning up some 4T nifti > images for cortical thickness analysis. Initially > our images were quite dark inferiorly due to the > nature of the RF coil used (it doesn't extend much > further than the temples resulting in signal > drop-off). > > I've managed to find what appears to be a decent fix > for the problem by running a higher number of > -nuiterations during -autorecon1; usually 20-50 > does the trick. Because I'm quite new to this, I was > wondering if this is an acceptable fix? Just wanted > to double-check with the experts before > moving forward. > > I've attached a screenshot contrasting image quality > of default iterations, 10, 20, and 50 iterations. > > It's also worth mentioning that -surfs appear to be > quite accurate especially after I lay down some > control points after an initial autorecon2 > run. > > Thank you very much for your help and patience, > > Dan > > > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom > it is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the > e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance > HelpLine at > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you > in error > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender > and properly > dispose of the e-mail. > > > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
