I don't think so, but perhaps Nick can comment. Are you positive you didn't run -autorecon2? Actually, maybe the placement of the ribbon will change the partial volume estimates for some subcortical structures? I can't remember the current sequence of events. Nick or Doug: do you know?

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013, Claudia Dacquino wrote:

Hi Bruce,I run FS 5.1. 
So for 5.1 version is it  normal that post editing aseg values ar different
from pre editing even using autorecon2-cp?
Thanks again
Claudia


2013/7/24 Bruce Fischl <[email protected]>
      I think it is, but I would visually inspect them. What FS
      version are you running? Earlier versions reran the aseg for
      autorecon2-cp, but 5.3 does not
      n Wed, 24 Jul 2013, Claudia Dacquino wrote:

      Thanks Bruce,but I'm sure I ran autorecon2-cp autorecon3:

      recon-all -autorecon2-cp -autorecon3 -subjid.

      However, is it ok to use aseg values post editing even if
      they look different from the pre editing
      ones?

      Thanks a lot.

      Claudia



      2013/7/24 Bruce Fischl <[email protected]>
            Hi Claudia

            if you run autorecon2 you will rerun the aseg, which
      will use the control points to change
            the subcortical intensity normalization. If you
      don't want that to happen, you need to run
            -autorecon2-cp

            cheers
            Bruce


            On Wed, 24 Jul 2013, Claudia Dacquino wrote:

                  Dear Freesurfers,we recently processed a
      sample of adult patients and then we
                  reran autorecon-2 and
                  autorecon-3 after editing contol points, white
      matter and pial surface.
                  We exported the asegstat table both pre and
      post editing, and we got different
                  volumes for most of the
                  subjects.
                  How is that possible, given that the kind of
      editing we performed is not
                  supposed to affect subcortical
                  segmentation?
                  Thanks a lot.
                  Claudia




      The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
      person to whom it is
      addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in
      error and the e-mail
      contains patient information, please contact the Partners
      Compliance HelpLine at
      http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was
      sent to you in error
      but does not contain patient information, please contact
      the sender and properly
      dispose of the e-mail.






_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to