Also, what kind of T2w sequence is this?  I think we've mostly tested it
with the T2-SPACE (unless Bruce has tested with other things).

Peace,

Matt.

On 9/27/13 12:58 PM, "Bruce Fischl" <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

>Hi Michael
>
>that looks pretty bad! What is the resolution of the T2? The T1 that you
>overlay on also looks somewhat blurry - what was it?
>
>Bruce
>
>
>On Fri, 27 Sep 
>2013, Michael Waskom wrote:
>
>> Hi, just to make the problem a bit more transparent, I took a second
>> screenshot of the slices with the pial surface from the -T2pial run in
>>red
>> and the pial surface from the normal run in
>> cyan: https://dl.dropbox.com/s/jv8rcxnq50tdac6/bad_slice_both_pial.png
>> 
>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Michael Waskom <mwas...@stanford.edu>
>> wrote:
>>       Hi,
>> I'm using FS 5.3 and trying to use hires T2-weighted scans to refine
>> the pial mesh.
>> 
>> However, I've found that using the T2 is causing rather dramatic
>> problems with the pial surface.
>> 
>> I processed the same subject's data with and without the -T2pial
>> option. Here are links to a) pial surface image b) slices through the
>> volume and c) the recon-all.log:
>> 
>> With -T2pial
>> ----------------
>> https://dl.dropbox.com/s/rtjgplajfptr4xb/bad_surf_withT2.png
>> https://dl.dropbox.com/s/d7so5qtujgg8j80/bad_slice_withT2.png
>> https://dl.dropbox.com/s/7o00jy014hihrgu/recon_log_withT2.txt
>> 
>> Without -T2pial
>> --------------------
>> https://dl.dropbox.com/s/51y15kogecltfbi/bad_surf_noT2.png
>> https://dl.dropbox.com/s/3gps45kp0ngkuli/bad_slice_noT2.png
>> https://dl.dropbox.com/s/6jih6f8fh4nwh0k/recon_log_noT2.txt
>> 
>> The release notes for 5.3 claim that the T2 is registered to the T1
>> before refining the surface, but I actually can't find any evidence of
>> that sequence in the log file. For this subject, the T1 and T2 came
>> from different scan sessions, although I have other data where they
>> were acquired in the same session that have similar, if less dramatic,
>> problems with the pial surface.
>> 
>> Any ideas?
>> 
>> Michael
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>_______________________________________________
>Freesurfer mailing list
>Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
>is
>addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
>e-mail
>contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>HelpLine at
>http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
>error
>but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
>properly
>dispose of the e-mail.


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to