Dear Freesurfer Mailing list,
While running a glm anlaysis with monte carlo correction (using cluster
wise thresholds of .05 & .01), I encountered the following issue:
When examining the clusters formed for each of the different cluster
wise thresholds, the .05 threshold resulted in a superior temporal
cluster, while the .01 threshold resulted in a two lateral occipital
clusters that did not overlap with the cluster from the .05 threshold.
Do you know why there would be no overlap between significant regions at
different cluster wise thresholds? I was aware that a cluster which is
significant at .05 may split or be smaller at .01, but I do not know why
entirely different regions would be significant.
--
Kind regards,
Bronwyn Overs
Research Assistant
Neuroscience Research Australia
Neuroscience Research Australia
Margarete Ainsworth Building
Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia
*M* 0411 308 769 *T* +61 2 9399 1883 *F* +61 2 9399 1265
neura.edu.au <http://neura.edu.au>
Follow @neuraustralia on twitter
<https://twitter.com/neuraustralia>Follow NeuRA on facebook
<https://www.facebook.com/NeuroscienceResearchAustralia>Subscribe to the
NeuRA Magazine <http://www.neura.edu.au/help-research/subscribe>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
