We are preparing a large dataset for sharing. It has already been processed and 
edited through freesurfer with the dicom files. We would like to share the MR 
scans in Nifti format instead of dicom, however we are encountering this 
difference in results. We are using dcm2niix to convert. We would like to stick 
with this program for conversion and the BIDS package. Any suggestions on how 
we can use this nifti output and get similar freesurfer results?
Thanks
Pamela



Douglas N 
Greve<http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu&q=from:%22Douglas+N+Greve%22>
 Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:35:38 
-0800<http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu&q=date:20160128>

I suspect that it has to do with the image geometry information. In

nifit, this is stored in quaterion format. In FS, this is converted to

direction cosines. This conversion is not reversible. So when you

mri_convert the DICOMS to nii, mri_convert will get the direction

cosines from the dicom file and convert them to quaternions. When you

run recon-all using the nii file, the quaternions are converted back to

direction cosines. But this does not yield exactly the same as what was

in the dicom file. This conversion does not happen when you start out

with mgz files. In version 6 I changed the code to try to reduce this

effect, but I think it will always be there.



On 01/28/2016 10:49 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote:

> can you run mri_diff on the orig.mgz in the two runs and send us the

> output?

> On Thu, 28 Jan 2016, Parzer, Peter wrote:

>

>> mri_convert

>> ________________________________________

>> Von: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

>> <freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> im Auftrag von dgw

>> <dgwake...@gmail.com>

>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2016 15:55

>> An: Freesurfer support list

>> Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] Segmentation depends on image file format

>>

>> What software did you use to generate the NIFTI files? Many of the

>> converters do different things to the axes of the data, and this does

>> affect results.

>>

>> hth

>> d

>>

>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Parzer, Peter

>> <peter.par...@med.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote:

>>> Hi,

>>>

>>> we have brain images stored as DICOM and as NIFTI files. For some time we

>>> used to import the NIFTI files to freesurfer for segmentation. I was

>>> curious if it makes a difference if we would import the DICOM files

>>> directly, and was surprised that it actually did. Here are the commands we

>>> used:

>>>


Pamela LaMontagne, PhD
Clinical Research Coordinator
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Radiology
Phone: (314) 362-3487
Voice: (314) 669-4551


________________________________

The material in this message is private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information (PHI). If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any 
unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance 
on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via 
telephone or return mail.




________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to