Hi Martin
Thanks a lot for your reply! Is there any reference that the longitudinal processing would fail if the difference in head size exceeded any certain value? Best, Dong 发件人: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] 代表 Martin Reuter 发送时间: 2017年2月15日 2:40 收件人: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> 主题: Re: [Freesurfer] Longitudinal proceesing for Pediatric data Hi Dong, it can work, if time points are close to each other (so not much head growth). Feel free to try, but make sure you are carefully looking at the surfaces, that no gray matter is clipped in later time points. The alternative is to only do cross sectional processing. Best, Martin On 14 Feb 2017, at 04:56, Dongnandi <dongnan...@163.com <mailto:dongnan...@163.com> > wrote: Dear freesurfer exports, As it is mentioned in the documentation that ‘pediatric data violates the fixed head size assumption’ for the current longitudinal stream. Is there any solution for the issue now? Thanks Dong _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
